G.R. Dt. 22nd August, 2023- Department of Housing- Sub- Guidelines for the Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings and Incomplete Redevelopment Projects in Mumbai
———————————————-
Guidelines for the Action to be taken in furtherance of amended Sections 77, 79A, 91A and 95A of the MHAD Act, 1976 in the matter of Redevelopment of the Dangerous declared Cessed Buildings in Mumbai City, as well as the Redevelopment Projects of Cessed Buildings left half-way through by the Owners/Developers under Regulations 33(6), 33(7) and 33(9) of the Development Control Regulations
Government of Maharashtra
Department of Housing
Government Resolution No:-ViManKa-2019/Pra.Kra.148 (Part-1)/DuVaPu-1,
Madam Cama Marg, Hutatma Raj Guru Chowk, New Administrative Building,
Mantralaya, Mumbai-400 032
Dated 22nd August, 2023
Vide:-
1] Government Resolution in the Department of Housing, No:-ViManKa-2016/Pra.Kra.142/DuVaPu-1, Dt. 29.11.2016.
2] Government Resolution in the Department of Housing, No:-ViManKa-2016/Pra.Kra.142 (Part-1)/DuVaPu-1, Dt. 05.11.2020.
3] Government Resolution in the Department of Housing, No:-ViManKa-2016/Pra.Kra.142 (Part-1)/DuVaPu-1, Dt. 05.03.2021.
4] Notification in the Department of Law and Judiciary, regarding the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development (Amendment) Act, 2020, Dt.02.12.2022.
————————-
Preface:-
Under above referred Government Resolution at Serial No.1, an Eight Member Legislative Committee was constituted to advise the Government to take a Policy decision in the matter of problems concerning cessed/non-cessed buildings in the island city of Mumbai, as well as the buildings affiliated with the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority. The Members of the said Committee have presented various recommendations to the Government vis-à-vis Redevelopment of cessed buildings. Pursuant to these recommendations, amendments to the provisions of Chapter VIII contained in the MHAD Act, 1976 were proposed. On 02.12.2022, the Department of Law & Judiciary finalised the amendments to Sections 77, 79, 91 and 95-A of the MHAD Act, 1976. In furtherance of these amendments, the Government contemplated the matter of issuing Guidelines for the Redevelopment of cessed buildings in Mumbai City.
GOVERNMENT RESOLUTION:-
In furtherance of the amendments to Section 77, Section 79A newly added to Section 79, Section 91A newly added to Section 91 and amendment to Section 95A of the MHAD Act, 1976, following Guidelines are hereby issued for the action to be taken in the matter of Redevelopment of dangerous declared cessed buildings in Mumbai City, as well as completion of the Redevelopment projects left half-way through by the owners/developers under Regulations 33(6), 33(7) and 33(9) of the Development Control Regulations:-
(1) Action to be taken pursuant to Section 79A newly added in Section 79A of the MHAD Act, 1976:-
Where, the Commissioner of the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai has served a written Notice upon the owner of a cessed building under Section 354 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 on the ground of it being dangerous, directing him to demolish it or the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board having found such building to be dangerous and as such posing danger or harm to the health and safety of its inhabitants, has served a written Notice upon the owner and the owner does not comply with such Notice within 3 months, then the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board should proceed to take the following action:-
(1.1) To undertake Redevelopment of the concerned Dangerous Cessed Buildings through their Owners:-
(a) The concerned Executive Engineer of the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board should serve a Notice under amended Section 79A of the MHAD Act, 1976, upon the owner of the cessed dangerous building and call upon him to submit to the Chief Officer of the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board, a proposal for the Redevelopment of the Building in conformity with the provisions of the Development Control Regulations, together with Irrevocable Consent Letter of minimum 51% tenants/residents thereof, within a period of 6 months. A Proforma of the Irrevocable Consent Letter and Check List of the documents to be submitted with the Redevelopment Proposal should be enclosed with the said Notice.
(b) The concerned Executive Engineer should satisfy himself that the said Notice is indeed served on the owner. If for any reason, the Notice is returned unserved, the said Notice should be published in the conspicuously visible part of the building and a Panchanama thereof should be drawn.
(c) The owner or the Developer appointed by him would be required to give a written proposal of Redevelopment to all tenants/residents and a copy thereof should be furnished to the Executive Engineer by the owner.
(d) The concerned Executive Engineer should satisfy himself that the proposal given by the owner to the tenants/residents includes Rehabilitation Area to be allotted under the provisions of the Development Control Regulations, Corpus Fund, arrangements for alternative accommodation/rent, amenities and facilities to be provided in the new building, as well as other ancillary matters.
(e) If required, the concerned Deputy Chief Engineer should convene a joint meeting of the owner and tenants/residents and make endeavors to put on track the redevelopment of such dangerous cessed building.
(f) The concerned Executive Engineer and Deputy Chief Engineer should scrutinize the proposal submitted by the owner and fix the eligibility of the tenants/residents as per the Government Resolutions/Guidelines issued by the Government, from time to time, and thereupon, place such proposal before the Chief Officer of the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board. Thereafter, the Chief Officer of the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board should grant to the applicant/owner/developer, a No-Objection Certificate, in conformity with the provisions of the Development Control Regulations.
(1.2) To undertake Redevelopment through the Proposed Co-operative Housing Society of Occupiers or Tenants, if the owner of the Dangerous Cessed Building fails to submit a Redevelopment Proposal within a Period of 6 Months:-
(a) Where the concerned Executive Engineer has served a Notice upon the owner and to his satisfaction it is proved to have been received by the owner and the owner fails to submit a proposal for Redevelopment within a period of 6 months, then the concerned Executive Engineer should serve a Notice under Section 79-A(1)(b) upon the proposed Co-operative Housing Society of minimum 51% tenants/residents or such tenants/residents and call upon them to submit to the Chief Officer of Mumbai Buildings Repairs and Reconstruction Board, their proposal for the Redevelopment of building in accordance with the provisions of the Development Control Regulations within a period of 6 months, along with Irrevocable Consent Letter of minimum 51% tenants/residents. Along with such Notice, a Proforma of the Irrevocable Consent Letter and the Check List of the documents to be submitted with the proposal for Redevelopment, should be enclosed.
(b) While serving such Notice, it should also be informed that 25% amount worked out on the basis of the prevailing Ready Reckoner or 15% Built-up Area out of the Saleable Built-up Area accruing from the project as per the permissible Floor Space Index, whichever being more, will have to be paid to the owner as a consideration in lieu of the land.
(c) Where the proposed Co-operative Housing Society of tenants/residents submits its proposal for Redevelopment, the concerned Executive Engineer and Deputy Chief Engineer should scrutinize such proposal and fix the eligibility of tenants/residents as per the Government Resolutions/Guidelines issued by the Government from time to time, and thereupon place such proposal before the Chief Officer of the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board.
(d) Thereafter, the Chief Officer of the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board should grant a No-Objection Certificate as per the provisions of the Development Control Regulations.
(1.3) To undertake Redevelopment of the Dangerous Cessed Building through Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board/MHADA, if the owner/the Proposed Co-operative Housing Society of the Occupiers or Tenants does not undertake it:-
(a) If the Proposed Co-operative Housing Society of the tenants/residents does not submit to the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board its Redevelopment Proposal within 6 Months, then the concerned Executive Engineer should initiate action for the acquisition of land, comprising such estate with buildings standing thereupon, under the provisions of Section 79-A(1)(c) of the MHAD Act, for which Irrevocable Consent Letter of 51% of tenants/residents would not be required.
(b) If the proposed Co-operative Housing Society of the tenants/residents or MHADA/Mumbai Buildings Repairs and Reconstruction Board undertakes Redevelopment Scheme, 25% amount worked out on the basis of the prevailing Ready Reckoner Rate or 15% Built-Up Area out of the Saleable Built-Up Area accruing from the project, as per the permissible Floor Space Index, whichever being more should be paid to the owner as consideration towards price of the land. The owner of building shall be at liberty to choose either of these two options.
(c) Once the Government accords its sanction for the acquisition of land, the Special Land Acquisition Officer would be obliged to complete the entire land acquisition proceedings within 3 months.
(d) In the meantime, the building being dangerous, the concerned Executive Engineer should initiate necessary action as per the provisions of the MHAD Act to avoid loss of life and property.
(e) The Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board, with prior sanction of the Government, should form a Panel of experienced Architects and Consultants at the level of MHADA for carrying out evaluation of such projects and from such Panel appropriate Architects and Consultants should be appointed promptly.
(f) The Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board should seek administrative sanction of the Vice-President and Chief Executive Officer of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority for the Budgetary estimates of project submitted by Architects and Consultants and thereupon proceed to invite Tenders for works. The Contractor under the received Tenders should be appointed with the prior sanction of the Government. While according prior sanction for the appointment of a Contractor, the Government should examine financial capacity and prior work experience of the Contractor in the light of eligibility criteria for a developer laid down in Government Resolution at Reference No.3 above.
(g) Upon completion of building work, Occupation Certificate should be obtained from the Municipal Corporation and tenants/residents should be rehabilitated.
(h) The funds required by the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board for the completion of its Project should be met from the funds received by the Board or be allocated from the funds of MHADA Authority. If necessary, a proposal should be submitted to the Government for making available such funds.
(i) The Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board should complete its Projects and carry out rehabilitation of tenants/residents and thereafter proceed to advertise and sell the surplus Saleable Built-up Area accruing from the Scheme, at the price worked out under Ready Reckoner or the Market Price, whichever being more, so as to recover its project cost.
(2) Action to be taken pursuant to Section 91A newly added to Section 91 of the MHAD Act, 1976:-
Where after grant of No-Objection Certificate by the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board in favour of an owner/developer for the Redevelopment of a cessed building as per the provisions of Regulation 33(6), 33(7) and 33(9) of the Development Control Regulations, the old and cessed building has come to be demolished, but the owner/developer has left the construction incomplete/delayed it/has not started redevelopment work within 3 years or where redevelopment work is stalled for more than two years from the grant of building permission for new building by the Municipal Corporation or where the owner/developer has violated terms and conditions under the No-Objection Certificate or where rent has not been paid to the tenants/residents on account of alternative accommodation then in such cases, the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board should initiate following action for the takeover of stalled/incomplete projects by acquisition of the property.
[A] Acquisition of Land:-
(1) In the first instance, the Chief Officer of the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board should serve a 15 days’ Notice under Section 91-A upon the No-Objection Certificate Holders and call upon the concerned parties to resume the incomplete work without any delay, to secure compliance of the terms and conditions under the No-Objection Certificate which were violated, and to pay the arrears of rent due to tenants/residents promptly.
(2) If the No-Objection Holder does not resume work within 15 days, does not secure compliance of the Terms & Conditions under the No-Objection Certificate which were contravened and further does not pay the outstanding rent due to tenants/residents, then the concerned Deputy Chief Engineer should give a joint hearing to the No-Objection Certificate Holder and tenants/residents.
(3) If despite hearing given by the concerned Deputy Chief Engineer, the No-Objection Certificate Holder does not resume incomplete work, does not secure compliance of the terms and conditions under the Certificate, which were contravened and further does not pay the outstanding rent due to the tenants/residents, then a proposal for the revocation of No-Objection Certificate granted by the Board and for acquisition of property should be submitted to the Chief Officer of the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board. Furthermore, the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai should be conveyed not to grant any further permission.
(4) The Chief Officer of the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board should revoke a No-Objection Certificate and prepare a proposal for the acquisition of land and property in its prevailing condition under the newly incorporated Section 91A of the MHAD Act, 1976 and submit the same for the sanction of the Government with approval of the Vice-President and Chief Executive Officer of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority.
(5) Once the Government grants its sanction for the land acquisition proposal, the Special Land Acquisition Officer/MHADA should complete the entire land acquisition proceedings within 3 months, as per the provisions of the MHAD Act.
(6) Upon Revocation of No-Objection Certificate, if the tenants/residents apply for the alternative accommodation, they should be allotted tenements, subject to their availability in Transit Camps of the Board. —
[B] Evaluation of the Projects left Incomplete:-
(1) Since the Architects and Experts appointed by the No-Objection Holders for the Project are well acquainted with the projects which are left incomplete, the Board should explore the possibility as to whether appointments can be given to them. Thereafter, an appropriate Architect and Consultant should be appointed from the Government constituted Panel of experienced Architects and Consultants by the Mumbai Buildings Repairs and Reconstruction Board for carrying out evaluation of the projects which were left incomplete.
(2) The Architect should carry out evaluation of the work carried out by the owner/developer having regard to its structural stability, in conformity with the Plan sanctioned by the Municipal Corporation. Furthermore, he should prepare budgetary estimates of the work (Rehabilitation + Saleable Construction) and present the same to the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board. It is incumbent that such budgetary estimates should include the dues payable to the Municipal Corporation on account of outstanding taxes or the amount payable on account of development charges and all other expenses.
(3) The Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board should seek administrative sanction of the Vice-President and Chief Executive Officer of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority for such budgetary estimates, invite tenders for the remaining work and by appointing contractor with the prior sanction of the Government, get the remaining redevelopment work completed. While appointing a contractor, the Government should examine financial capacity and prior work experience of the contractor along the lines of eligibility laid down for a developer in Government Resolution at Reference No. 3 above.
(4) Upon completion of building work, occupation certificate should be obtained from the Municipal Corporation and thereafter in the first instance, tenants/residents should be rehabilitated as per the sanctioned plan.
(5) The funds required for the completion of redevelopment project, should be met from the funds received by the Mumbai Buildings Repairs and Reconstruction Board or be assigned from the funds of the MHADA Authority. If necessary, a proposal should be submitted to the Government for providing such funds.
(6) If, after carrying out rehabilitation of the tenants/residents upon completion of entire project construction work by the board, the sale of saleable built-up area to the purchasers and the payments due to the investors, the cost of board cannot be recovered, then in such cases, possibility of granting extra floor space index to the MHADA or any other available option can be explored as a special matter and necessary proposal in that regard should be submitted to the Government through the Chief Officer of the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board.
(7) Upon completion of project and rehabilitation of the tenants/residents, the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board should advertise and sell the flats on account of surplus saleable built-up area accruing from the scheme, at the Ready Reckoner Price or Market Price, whichever is more, and recover the cost of project.
[C] To Appoint an Arbitrator to resolve the Problems of Investors/Banks who have invested in the Incomplete Projects:-
(1) With prior sanction of the Government a Panel of experienced Arbitrators should be constituted at the level of MHADA for the appointment of an experienced Arbitrator who can evaluate and verify the liability towards the financial institutes/banks that have advanced loans to the No-Objection Certificate Holders of Redevelopment Projects, the liability towards the purchasers of flats and any other liability arising out of the project and from such Panel appropriate Arbitrator should be appointed.
(2) Where No-Objection Certificate Holders have sold surplus built-up area to any person under Registered Agreements or any other person/bank has invested therein, the Arbitrator, in order to verify such fact should publish a Notice in the local newspaper (English, Marathi, Hindi, Gujarati and Urdu) and invite objections thereto and after examining documents in the light of objections so received, take a decision thereon.
(3) Where owner/developer has sold saleable built-up area under registered agreements, it should be verified as to how much amounts purchasers have paid to the developer and how much is still payable before the respective flats can be delivered to them. Upon such verification, the price worked out as per the Ready Reckoner or the price under Registered Agreement, whichever being more should be fixed and the remaining amount should be recovered from such persons. If such person is not ready to pay the price of flat, the Arbitrator should ascertain the amount already paid by him and take a decision, vis-à-vis its refund.
(4) Where a bank has advanced loan to the No-Objection Certificate Holder for the project in question, the Arbitrator should examine documents to ascertain the amount payable to the bank and take a decision accordingly.
(5) The amount of outstanding rent payable to the residents in an incomplete project should be computed. The Arbitrator should make a self-explanatory recommendations to the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board for deducting the outstanding rent amount in respect of incomplete projects from the consideration payable to the owner/developer.
(6) Upon ratification of the decision of the Arbitrator by the Chief Officer of the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board, the amounts payable to the investors/financial institutes/banks should be paid by the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board after completion of the project, as per the availability of funds.
[D] Action to be taken by the Special Land Acquisition Officer/MHADA in the matter of Acquisition of Land:-
(1) Once the Government grants its sanction for the land acquisition proposal, the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board should forward such government sanctioned land acquisition proposal to the Land Acquisition Officer for initiating acquisition of land; The Land Acquisition Officer should promptly complete such land acquisition proceedings, possibility within three months.
(2) Upon receipt of land acquisition proposal from the Mumbai Building and Repairs and Reconstruction Board, the Special Land Acquisition Officer should promptly scrutinize the case and get himself acquainted with all the facts of case and proceed to simultaneously publish a Notice in the Government Gazette and minimum four newspapers circulating in Greater Mumbai, as per the provision of Section 93(3) of the MHAD Act (such proceedings to be completed in 15 days).
(3) The Land Acquisition Officer shall serve a Notice, under the provision of Section 93(4) of the MHAD Act, upon the occupiers and owners of building, as well as each such mortgagee of the building, as it is reasonable possible to verify and ask them to show cause as to why such land should not be acquired and further direct them to submit to him their objections and suggestions, if any, on or before the date specified in the Notice (The period of submitting objections/suggestions shall be of 15 days).
(4) Upon receipt of bilateral objections from the No-Objection Holders/owners/tenants/residents, the Special Land Acquisition Officer would be obliged to conduct a hearing within 15 days of the receipt of such objections under Section 93(4) of the MHAD Act.
(5) After giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the persons affected by such proposal and after applying his mind to the objections and suggestions so made, as per the provisions of Section 93(5) of the MHAD Act, the Land Acquisition Officer shall sanction such proposal, with such alterations (alterations to receive sanction of the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board) or without any alterations and shall proceed to publish a Notification in the Government Gazette, fixing a date from which such proposal shall come into force and thereupon, the land specified therein, on and from the date so published, shall vest absolutely and without any encumbrances, in the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board, claiming under the Authority (this period shall be of 30 days).
(6) Action shall be initiated under Section 44 of the MHAD Act, 1976 to serve individual Notice upon all persons having vested interest in the land acquisition compensation.
(7) The Notification published by the Land Acquisition Officer as per the provisions of Section 93(6) of the MHAD Act, shall be sufficient to empower the District Collector to serve a Notice upon the occupiers of land directing them to hand over its possession or surrender the same within the specified period and in case of their failure or negligence to do so, to recover possession of the land and to use sufficient force, as may be required for the purpose and to hand over the possession thereof to the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board and further empower the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board to vacate such building and to take further action in the matter. Any person having vested interest in the land shall not be entitled to object to the recovery of possession or to vacating the building, only on the ground that the amount of compensation has not been fixed or paid. (this period is of 15 days).
(E) Consideration to be Paid to the Owner/Developer:-
(1) The owner/developer of the project should be paid amount equal to 25% of the amount worked out on the basis of prevailing Ready Reckoner or 15% of built-up area from the surplus saleable built-up area, whichever being more, towards consideration on account of price of the land, as per the provisions of Section 79-A(2) of the MHAD Act.
(2) The outstanding amount of rent payable to the tenants/residents on account of alternative accommodation, as intimated by the Arbitrator, should be deducted from the amount of consideration payable to the owner/developer.
(3) Where any bank or other investors have advanced loans to the owner/developer for the project, the amount already paid by the purchasers in the project to the owner/developer on account of purchase of flats from the saleable component, should be deducted from the amount of consideration payable to the owner/developer.
(4) Where the outstanding rent payable to the tenants/residents or the amounts invested by the investors or other outstanding amounts exceed the amount payable to the owner on account of land, the owner should not be paid the amount of consideration on account of land. In such case, for the recovery of excess amounts from the owner/developer, the details of his other moveable and immoveable properties should be collected and a proposal for the attachment of properties should be forwarded to the District Collector by the Chief Officer of the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board. The concerned District Collector should verify the details submitted by the Board and promptly complete the proceedings for the attachment of owner/developer’s properties and after auction of the attached properties, the proceeds realised should be handed over to the MHADA/Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board.
[F] Action to be taken against Owner/Developer:-
(1) Where it is established that owner/developer has defrauded tenants/residents by violating the terms and conditions of the No-Objection Certificate granted by the Board or by ceasing to pay the rent on account of its alternative accommodation, the concerned Executive Engineer should examine case-wise merits of the case and with the sanction of the Chief Officer of the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board, duly lodge a First Information Report (FIR) at the concerned Police Station.
(2) Those owners/developers who have left Redevelopment Projects incomplete, should not be granted No-Objection Certificate by the Board for other Redevelopment Schemes. Furthermore, if such owners/developers are partners in other companies and Redevelopment Proposals are submitted to the Board then in such cases, No-Objection Certificates should not be granted by the Board for such Redevelopment Schemes.
(3) Those owners/developers who have left Redevelopment Projects incomplete should be blacklisted by the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board and the Chief Officer of the RR Board should accordingly inform all concerned parties, Departments of MHADA, Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai (Building Proposal), as well as the Government.
[3] Assistance from the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai:-
In order to enable the Board to perform its duties and discharge its functions the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai, shall, from time to time, offer such information and necessary records, maps, plans and other documents, for the purpose of inspection and checking. Furthermore, if Revised Plans of the Projects left incomplete by the owner/developer are submitted by the Board, prompt sanction therefor should be granted by the concerned Building Proposal Department of the Municipal Corporation Greater Mumbai.
[4] Assistance from the District Collector, Mumbai City:-
He shall offer all necessary assistance and aid for completing land acquisition of the projects left incomplete by the owner/developer. He should take prompt action on the proposals submitted by the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board for the attachment of properties of the owners who have left the projects incomplete. Furthermore, he should provide the necessary records and other documents for the purpose of inspection and checking.
This Government Resolution has been made available on the website of the Government of Maharashtra viz. www.maharashtra.gov.in and its Code Number is 202308221715038409. This Resolution is attested and issued under digital signature.
By the order and in the name of the Governor of Maharashtra,
AJIT MALHARI KAWADE – Digital Signature
[Ajit Kawade]
Deputy Secretary, Government of Maharashtra
Copy:-
1] The Secretary to the Hon’ble Governor (By Letter),
2] Hon’ble Chairperson/Vice-Chairperson, Maharashtra Legislative Council, Maharashtra Legislative Secretariat, Mumbai,
3] The Hon’ble Speaker/Deputy Speaker, Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, Maharashtra Legislature Secretariat, Mumbai,
4] The Principal Secretary to the Hon’ble Chief Minister,
5] The Principal Secretary to the Hon’ble Deputy Chief Minister,
6] The Principal Secretary to the Hon’ble Deputy Chief Minister,
7] The Private Secretary to the Hon’ble Minister (Housing),
8] Private Secretaries to all Ministers/Ministers of State, Mantralaya, Mumbai,
9] Hon’ble Leaders of Opposition in the Legislative Council/Legislative Assembly, Maharashtra Legislative Secretariat, Mumbai,
10] All Hon’ble Members of the Legislative Assembly and Legislative Council,
11] Hon’ble Chief Secretary, Government of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, Mumbai,
12] The Additional Chief Secretary (Revenue), Department of Revenue and Forest, Manatralaya, Mumbai,
13] The Additional Chief Secretary (Finance), Department of Finance, Mantralaya, Mumbai,
14] The Additional Chief Secretary (Housing), Department of Housing, Mantralaya, Mumbai,
15] The Additional Chief Secretary (UD-1), Department of Urban Development, Mantralaya, Mumbai,
16] The Principal Secretary (UD-2), Department of Urban Development, Mantralaya, Mumbai,
17] The Principal Secretary (Co-operation), Department of Co-operation and Textile, Mantralaya, Mumbai,
18] The Commissioner, the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai, Mumbai,
19] The Vice-President and Chief Executive Officer, the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority, Bandra , Mumbai,
20] The Chief Executive Officer, the Slum Rehabilitation Authority, Bandra, Mumbai,
21] The Chief Officer, the Mumbai Buildings Repairs and Reconstruction Board, Bandra, Mumbai,
22] Chief Officers of the Housing and Area Development Boards, Mumbai/Konkan/Pune/Nashik/Aurangabad/Amravati/Nagpur,
23] The Director General, the Directorate of Information and Public Relations, Mumbai,
24] All Administrative Departments in Mantralaya,
25] The District Collector, Mumbai City,
26] All Deputy Secretaries/Under Secretaries, Department of Housing, Mantralaya, Mumbai,
27] Select File, Desk, DuVaPu-1, For Record.
——————————
[Text Translated by Adv. Prakash Manohar Chalke-
Copyright Reserved]©
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@